Actions! what are these? why do we have to take these so-called Actions. What compels us to take these righteous or unfair or even corrupted acts? Actions can be defined as "Doing Something" now these doings are caused due to an effect, effect is caused due to a reason. Reason is established due to Acts. So to precise it all up our "Actions" pushes us to take "Counter Actions". Now on this road of Actions we have feelings, these feelings describe our counter actions. Feelings have a very deep enrooted connection with the expectations you have build up inside your minds. First of all, I would like to add that people who say "not to have expectations from any one" dude, you, yourself, are having expectations just by saying not to expect cause basically you are expecting from yourself not expecting anything.
But how to know that the counter actions you are taking is the right thing to do. How can you determine that? If the counter action is taken by someone else you can’t do anything about it except to welcome it with open arms and learn to accept it, the sooner the better, but what if YOU have to make the counter act.
We humans possess a very biased personality. Its a built-in trait, which gives us the commonalty ground, in the end we will meet here. We might, in front, stating other party's benefit but on the backend it's we who are in continuous and constant worry about ourselves. We might be saving our self from any future pain or expectation to excel to a jurisdiction you don’t want to go or enter in.
But still the question remains, what is that determinant which will help us, lead us, to take the "Right Action"? Our experiences in the past teaches us not to make that same mistake cause if we do we will only get our self burned. Yet we take that step, may be because we can’t find any other way or we don’t want to see it or if you are courageous enough, you will gather your strength, make up your mind, close your eyes, take a deep breath and take a new step forward with or without thinking about the impact of that one step.
To be honest there are no "Right Actions" or "Wrong Actions". These are just perceptions that both the party creates. There can be a very justified reason for the action taken by me but it doesn’t necessarily mean that my definition of problem is same as yours which will create differentiation in the justification of the reason. Whatever action you take will always be the wrong one in the other's eye. It’s like you can see a person's lips moving but you can’t hear what that person is actually saying. But, when you realize, you can properly make out the words and might even understand what that person was actually talking about.
But how to know that the counter actions you are taking is the right thing to do. How can you determine that? If the counter action is taken by someone else you can’t do anything about it except to welcome it with open arms and learn to accept it, the sooner the better, but what if YOU have to make the counter act.
We humans possess a very biased personality. Its a built-in trait, which gives us the commonalty ground, in the end we will meet here. We might, in front, stating other party's benefit but on the backend it's we who are in continuous and constant worry about ourselves. We might be saving our self from any future pain or expectation to excel to a jurisdiction you don’t want to go or enter in.
But still the question remains, what is that determinant which will help us, lead us, to take the "Right Action"? Our experiences in the past teaches us not to make that same mistake cause if we do we will only get our self burned. Yet we take that step, may be because we can’t find any other way or we don’t want to see it or if you are courageous enough, you will gather your strength, make up your mind, close your eyes, take a deep breath and take a new step forward with or without thinking about the impact of that one step.
To be honest there are no "Right Actions" or "Wrong Actions". These are just perceptions that both the party creates. There can be a very justified reason for the action taken by me but it doesn’t necessarily mean that my definition of problem is same as yours which will create differentiation in the justification of the reason. Whatever action you take will always be the wrong one in the other's eye. It’s like you can see a person's lips moving but you can’t hear what that person is actually saying. But, when you realize, you can properly make out the words and might even understand what that person was actually talking about.
